‘Dumb and Dumber To’ Too Much (Movie Review)
Dumb
and Dumber To:
2 out of 5
Harry: Whoa, Lloyd. Check out the hotties at 12 o’clock.
Lloyd: That’s three hours away. Why can’t I check ‘em out now?
Lloyd: That’s three hours away. Why can’t I check ‘em out now?
So I didn’t laugh all
that much. It is irritating to have to
be on the defensive for an opinion of a film that really does not need critical
weight to determine if someone wants to see it or not. If I was not writing film reviews, I would
have still no doubt seen Dumb and Dumber
To, because I like the first one, I like the actors, I like the Farrelly
Brothers, and I would be happy to embrace my curiosity on this thing. As it turns out, I did not like this
movie. It is a mix of dialing up the
antics and raunchiness, as any comedy sequel would be prone to do, while also
relying on rehashes of what was believed to make the first film work. This results in a film that is a little
meaner (odd for the generally sweet Farrellys) and lot less funny. Sure it is subjective and I have no shame in
saying that I laughed a good few times, but overall, it mostly fell flat.
For those in need of a
brief recap, this sequel to the 1994 comedy hit finds Jim Carrey and Jeff
Daniels back together again as Lloyd and Harry.
Some brief attempts are made to poke fun at the fact that 20 years have
passed and the guys are older, but nothing has essentially changed. Following the opening minutes, which return
the guys to status quo, a similar plot to the first film gets underway. It revolves around Harry and Lloyd going on a
road trip together in an effort to deliver something important to the girl of
Lloyd’s dreams, all the while, a nefarious set of characters are also out to
kill them.
If it sounds familiar,
it is because it is. While some comedy
sequels know how to change things up the second time around (Addams Family Values), others are
content to do the thing that worked the first time around (The Hangover: Part II), and others somehow do that same thing, but
openly acknowledge it, making it somewhat better (22 Jump Street). Dumb and Dumber To falls into the trap
of retelling the same story, but it is not the plot that is bothersome. Honestly, I don’t feel like I would be giving
this film a fair shake if I were to criticize it just for having a similar
plot. It comes down to what I want from
a film like this, and what I wanted was laughs.
To back up, I am a big
Farrelly Brothers fan. I consider Kingpin and There’s Something About Mary to be two of my favorite comedies of
the 90s. I have varying amounts of
appreciation for their films that followed, but even when I don’t find them to
be laugh riots, I love the way they essentially put forth films full of
sentiment and nice messages (along with their immense respect for the disabled). This is why the original Dumb and Dumber is sort of an outlier in their catalogue. While the main takeaway, beyond the gags, is
the sense of eternal brotherly love, it is not nearly as sweet a film as the
rest of the Farrelly’s features. Now
that we have a sequel, it is like watching more of that thing that worked so well
the first time, because it came as a sort of surprise dare that worked, but now
with the flame having gone out near completely.
Dumb
and Dumber To is not without moments though and the
cast is certainly game. Jim Carrey is,
like it or not, in the same sort of prime form that made him a star back in
1994, when he had Ace Ventura, The Mask, and
Dumb and Dumber all breakout. In this film, he is back to the absurdist
goofball that tries to zing out jokes as fast as he can at all moments. Jeff Daniels is not falling short either, as
he attempts to mine at ton out of what works for him in this kind of film. The guys clearly like having fun together, as
the first half of the film is basically these guys riffing with each
other. That said, I think I actually
liked seeing them separately a little more than together, as far as my
tolerance for aspects of this film goes.
Along with Daniels and
Carrey (who I must emphasize, really do look their age, but are still willing
to go all in), the film is also populated by Rob Riggle, Laurie Holden, Rachel
Melvin (who is delightfully doofy as well), and a very game Kathleen
Turner. The film may bring back a lot of
fan favorite elements from the first film, but it does at least try to bring in
a new set of characters for these idiots to interact with. Still, some good gags aside, while this cast
certainly tries to make things work, I just did not find myself laughing that
much, which is all I really wanted to do.
There is not much else
to say here. One can argue that in order
to laugh at a film like this, you really have to turn your brain off and just
let it all go. That is fine for those
who do that, but I was pretty pleased to leave my brain on and watch the first
film again a couple days ago, let alone other, very silly comedies, and laugh
throughout. Dumb and Dumber To is just not very good. I laughed a little, not a lot, and not nearly
enough to praise it for the sake of others.
Harry: This is my associate, Dr. Christmas.
Dr. Meldman: Christmas, as in the holiday?
Lloyd: No, as in the tree.
Dr. Meldman: Christmas, as in the holiday?
Lloyd: No, as in the tree.
Comments
Post a Comment