‘Flight’ Coasts With Good Acting, In The Midst Of A Stormy, Heavy-Handed Drama
Flight: 2 ½ out of 5
Whip: Nobody could've landed that plane like I did.
There is a
solid 30 minutes of Flight that makes
for one really compelling drama. It involves a sequence that will terrify
anyone that was already a nervous flier and sets up possible stakes for the
rest of the film. Unfortunately, that was merely the film that was being
advertised, not the one that we see in Flight, the return to live-action
filmmaking for director Robert Zemeckis. The rest of this film is
generally well-acted all around, but also very heavy-handed, as we watch Denzel
Washington’s character deal with the effects of alcoholism from an internal
level, as the film does not give him much of a life to see self-destruct
elsewhere. As a result, this is a film that is admirable for existing as
an adult character study, but is also overlong and uneven, hwile cruising at a
safe altitude.
Denzel
Washington stars as airline captain Whip Whitaker, a great pilot who is also a
functioning alcoholic. We see examples of both in the beginning of the
film. When we first meet Whip, he has just awakened from a night of heavy
drinking, which he counteracts by doing a line of cocaine, before reporting for
duty as the captain of a flight to Atlanta. During the flight, some sort
of mechanical failure occurs, which forces Whip to use his instincts to pull
off a miracle maneuver, saving the lives of nearly all the lives aboard the
plane.
Having
crash-landed the plane, knocking himself unconscious, Whip wakes up without
much injury and is eventually able to leave the hospital. He learns the
news regarding those who did not survive and is also made aware that the
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) performed a toxicology screen,
which shows that Whip was intoxicated while flying and could face manslaughter
charges. Despite help from his friend and representative in the airline
pilots union, Charlie (Bruce Greenwood), along with a Chicago criminal
attorney, Hugh (Don Cheadle), Whip is bent on dealing with his issues almost
entirely on his own. What follows is Whip’s journey, as he balances the
idea of doing things his way and redeeming himself for the better.
As I said,
how we see Denzel’s character during the opening of this film; waking up in the
morning, with all sorts of things going on that you would never want to see
your pilot involved in, followed by his heroic efforts to save a plane full of
passengers is wonderfully staged, intense, and engaging. The fact that
this is a rather exciting opening that is followed by a much more low-key drama
about a man’s struggle against addiction is not the reason that the film suffers.
It suffers because this storyline is not particularly well-handled, let alone
fresh, as it is simply an addiction story with some powerhouse talent behind
it.
Is it
impressive to see someone like Denzel Washington play a drunk and make you feel
uncomfortable because of the choices that you see him make and the behavior
that you see him exhibit? Yes, it is and Washington is certainly capable
enough as an actor to really make you worry for him, as he is quite charismatic
in general, but does a good job of having you hate the choices that he
makes. The problem is that there really is not much of a life for Whip to
ruin over the course of this film. By the time it opens, Whip already has
not family to lose, has no real friends, and only goes on to isolate himself
from everyone. By doing this, the movie ends up repeating a lot of the
same beats over and over, as we watch Whip abuse alcohol, get into some kind of
argument about his drinking with some character that has a soft spot for him,
and then see him stir in turmoil. This is a familiar ‘demon in a bottle’
storyline that has come up often in films and Flight is not doing a
whole lot to make it seem fresh.
Further
hampering things is the way that spirituality seems to pop up in the film. Flight is coming right out in saying
that “God works in mysterious ways”, as John Gatins screenplay is really
hitting you over the head with various monologues about how people are
interpreting theirs lives and those around them, while Zemeckis’ direction
assures you of what is happening in the story with his assured, but unsubtle
direction (come to think of it, Contact
and Cast Away had similar elements).
These things would be less bothersome if the film didn’t end with a finale that
feels like a checklist of everything that needs to happen for this kind of
movie to resolve itself. However, the
film does have an 11th hour decision, which puts the movie in its
desired position of keeping a nice face on our lead. I do like that Flight does not spend its time making us want to like Whip and
instead let us question him, but once again, the whole thing is pretty ham-fisted.
Now,
putting all of that out there, the film does have its admirable
qualities. I do think Denzel Washington is very strong here. He may
not be stretching himself further than I was hoping, but even a comfortable
Denzel is a very good one. The supporting cast is also quite good.
John Goodman’s comic role as Whip’s drug dealer may be pushing the tone of the
film into awkward territory, especially when he shows up later in the film, but
he and Washington have great chemistry. Similarly, Don Cheadle (A
complete opposite character turn from the last time he co-starred in a film
with Washington – Devil in a Blue Dress) is able to work well with
Washington, even if every other interaction he has in the film involves him
mentioning how good he is at his job and that he’ll “kill the tox
report”. Even the minor players are quite effective, as Nadine Velazquez
has a small, but important role, along with Tamara Tunie as well. The
most important role should be Kelly Reilly as Nicole, who becomes the one
person Whip can find himself relating with, however I don’t think that
character ends up working as well as she should here.
Flight does not end up soaring, despite
the attempts to make it fly high from the work coming out of Denzel and the
other actors involved, along with the filmmakers. It feels like it should
be a more involving story, given how it goes from a thrilling scenario and into
the resulting aftermath, but that shift does not push the story into an area
that requires the whole 140 minute running time it has to tell it. Again,
I was not disappointed with what the movie ended up being, I am disappointed
that the people involved could not make a better film , which is really more of
a screenplay issue. As it stands, Flight merely cruises along at a
mid-range level.
Hugh Lang: I'm trying to save your life!
Whip: What life?
Aaron
is a writer/reviewer for WhySoBlu.com.
Follow him on Twitter @AaronsPS3.
He also co-hosts a podcast, Out Now with Aaron and Abe, available via iTunes or at HHWLOD.com.
He also co-hosts a podcast, Out Now with Aaron and Abe, available via iTunes or at HHWLOD.com.
Comments
Post a Comment