‘The Paperboy’ Misses The Delivery
The
Paperboy: 2 out of 5
Hillary Van Wetter: These your paperboys? What are they gonna do for me?
Charlotte Bless: They’re gonna save you.
It seems like The Paperboy should have enough to make
it an entertaining, trashy thriller. It
has all of the right ingredients, with several actors giving strong
performances just for the sake of adding on to a film that does not even really
need it. Yet, the plot is shapeless and
lacks anything that resembles a sense of urgency. There is plenty of material present to make a
story that is much more engaging, but the film instead putters out fairly inconsistently,
not quite knowing what to stick with or know what works best. The
Paperboy is a swamp noir that gets caught in the muck.
The film stars Matthew
McConaughey as Ward Jansen; a reporter for the Miami Times during the 1960s, who has returned to his hometown of
Lately, Florida, along with his writing partner, Yardley Acherman (David
Oyelowo). The two have come to Lately to
look into the story of a man who has been convicted of killing a corrupt
sheriff. This man is Hillary Van Wetter
(John Cusack), who is now on death-row, but claims to have been framed. Joining Ward and Yardley on their visits to
Hillary in prison is Charlotte Bless (Nicole Kidman), who is a death-row
groupie of sorts, as she develops relationships with these types of prisoners. Also joining the group is Ward’s little brother
Jack (Zac Efron), who quickly develops a crush on Charlotte. The story is narrated by the Jansen family’s
maid, Anita (Macy Gray), who is well aware of Jack’s infatuation. As the story continues, we find out how far
Ward’s investigation is able to go in order to possibly get him the great story
he hopes to write and possibly help free Van Wetter, assuming he deserves
freedom.
The
Paperboy was inspired by a true story, which was then
written as a novel by Pete Dexter. The
film has been adapted for the screen and directed by Lee Daniels (Precious), who seems to have all the
material he needs, but does not know how to connect the dots effectively. Instead, he has put together a messy film
that features plenty of “Acting!” that ranges from Nicole Kidman being an incredibly
sultry seductress to John Cusack at his most batshit insane redneckness, but
without enough skill to make this an effective display that benefits all that
the actors are trying for. Instead, we
have actors that are trying, but we also have to deal with a film that has way
too many stylistic flourishes that try to make a muddy bayou look more
interesting than it is, awkward editing, and a lack of more in the way of
assured storytelling.
There were plenty of
opportunities to have the film worked, if it simply chose a path and stuck with
it, but the film does not so much twist and turn as it just throws everything
in and hopes it tastes good. I have seen
other southern noirs that play out more effectively, despite all that is
involved. 1998’s Wild Things is an easy callback, which similarly featured all of
the elements of the most trashy story possible, but managed to have plenty of
fun doing so in a well-conceived plot (yes, Wild
Things does have more to offer than just those key scenes that many guys know). An even better example is this year’s Killer Joe (also featuring McConaughey),
which took trailer trash depravity to new levels (I’m not sure how new at this
point, given the presence of Honey Boo-Boo), but was still also incredibly twisted
and darkly hilarious in a very good way.
The Paperboy misses out on
cashing in on the good it has, finding entertaining scenes, sure, but not
enough to have one overlook the messiness of its storytelling and the flatness
of its overall payoff.
It is a shame too,
because there are some generally solid performances in this film. Most notable is probably Nicole Kidman, who
seems to be the one actress involved that is gunning for award recognition. The way Kidman plays the Charlotte character
is only more effective once you get to some of the deeper layers of her
character and I liked that. It reminded
me a bit of her breakout role in To Die
For. Cusack is notable just because
I have not seen him play this type of person before, which is a dirty, redneck
slimeball. McConaughey continues to
shine this year, even if he seems pretty at home with this character. Zac Efron unfortunately does not bring much
to the table, as he is merely the looking glass for the audience and also
seemingly in touch with the 60s equivalent of a Calvin Klein commercial, as he
spends what seems like a majority of this film in his underwear. The last person to touch on is Macy Gray, who
is actually quite good. I could have
dealt without some of the ways that Daniels handled inserting her narration,
but overall, if he can get an Oscar-winning performance out of Mo’Nique, then I
am not surprised that he is able to get good work from Gray as well.
Other trashy
noir/thrillers have covered this territory better. The
Paperboy may seem like a stylish pulpy feature, but it lacks in other areas
to give it more depth. Most of the
actors step up to the plate, but the overall film cannot quite bring it
home. Even the end of the film feels
like it gave up. Sometimes a messy
feature can still reach solid heights because of its ambition. This film seems to have misplaced that
ambition, but tried anyway, only strike out by the end.
Charlotte Bless: I don’t think I’m gonna like living in a swamp.
Aaron
is a writer/reviewer for WhySoBlu.com.
Follow him on Twitter @AaronsPS3.
He also co-hosts a podcast, Out Now with Aaron and Abe, available via iTunes or at HHWLOD.com.
He also co-hosts a podcast, Out Now with Aaron and Abe, available via iTunes or at HHWLOD.com.
Comments
Post a Comment